Skip to main content
Glama
SoundCloud MCP Server

SoundCloud MCP Server

by jamiew

Unlike playlist

unlike_playlist
Idempotent

Remove a like from a playlist or station by playlist ID, so you can undo an accidental or outdated favorite in your SoundCloud library.

Instructions

Remove a like from a playlist or a station.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "playlistId": "<playlistId>"
    },
    "name": "unlike_playlist"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
playlistIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.1.2

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered structurally. The description adds nothing beyond the restated action — no note on auth requirements, what happens if no like exists, or what is returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with the action front-loaded and no filler. It is efficient, though brevity here comes at the cost of the missing detail noted in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema and an entirely undescribed parameter, the definition should carry more weight. It leaves open the target format, permission requirements, and the mismatch between the 'station' target it advertises and the playlistId-only schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the sole parameter playlistId accepts both string and number types. The description never explains whether an ID, URN, or URL is expected, who can unlike a playlist, or how the 'station' case maps to playlistId, so it fails to compensate for the undocumented schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and resource ("Remove a like from a playlist or a station"), which distinguishes it from siblings like unrepost_playlist and unlike_track. The 'station' mention slightly muddies the target since the schema only exposes playlistId.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative routing is given. The agent must infer from the name alone whether to use this versus unrepost_playlist, unlike_track, or remove_track_from_playlist, all of which appear in the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.