Skip to main content
Glama
SoundCloud MCP Server

SoundCloud MCP Server

by jamiew

Get recently played

get_recently_played
Read-only

Retrieves the tracks a connected SoundCloud user played recently, ordered newest first, with an optional limit and verbose detail.

Instructions

Tracks the connected user played recently, most recent first.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_recently_played"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
verboseNoReturn every field SoundCloud sends, such as descriptions, not the compact summary

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
next_hrefNoNext page URL; pass to next_page
collectionYesPage items

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.1.2

TDQS

B3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, open-world operation. The description adds useful behavioral scope by tying results to the connected user and stating most-recent-first ordering, but it omits pagination, limits, and any authentication caveat beyond what the annotations imply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. The phrasing 'Tracks the connected user played recently' is slightly awkward, but the sentence remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and annotations cover safety. However, for a two-parameter retrieval tool the description still leaves limit semantics and routing relative to get_feed or get_user_tracks unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain either parameter. The verbose parameter is covered by schema text, but limit has no schema description, and the description does not compensate by clarifying its meaning, default, or maximum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource as tracks recently played by the connected user and specifies ordering as most recent first. It is clear enough to distinguish this from adjacent retrieval tools, but it does not explicitly name or contrast any sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and no named alternative such as get_feed or get_user_tracks. The use case is implied by the phrase 'played recently,' but the description leaves selection between siblings to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.