Skip to main content
Glama
SoundCloud MCP Server

SoundCloud MCP Server

by jamiew

Get my playlists

get_my_playlists
Read-only

List the connected user's SoundCloud playlists to review saved collections; set a limit or request verbose details for descriptions.

Instructions

List the connected user's playlists.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_my_playlists"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
verboseNoReturn every field SoundCloud sends, such as descriptions, not the compact summary

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
next_hrefNoNext page URL; pass to next_page
collectionYesPage items

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.1.2

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the connected-user scope, which is useful authenticated-context information, but it does not mention pagination, ordering, rate limits, or how to retrieve further results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. It is as concise as possible for the stated purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, has annotations covering safety, and has an output schema, so the description does not need to explain return values. However, it leaves out usage routing among siblings and does not clarify the limit parameter, which is a meaningful gap for an otherwise straightforward list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50%: verbose is documented in the schema, while limit has no description beyond type/default/min/max. The description says nothing about what limit controls or how verbose changes the response, so it does not compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: list the connected user's playlists. It clearly implies the authenticated-user scope, which distinguishes it from generic user-playlist siblings, but it does not explicitly name alternatives such as get_user_playlists or search_playlists.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus get_user_playlists, search_playlists, or next_page. The connected-user scope provides a weak implied distinction, but no alternatives, exclusions, or pagination context are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.