quire.getStorageValue

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation already declares 'readOnlyHint: true', and the description does not add further behavioral disclosure. For a simple read operation, this is adequate but lacks details on error handling (e.g., missing key).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, succinct sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter, annotations present, and no output schema, the description is mostly complete. It could mention the return value or behavior when the key is not found, but overall it sufficiently describes the tool's purpose for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema description for 'name' is 'The storage key name'. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'get', the resource 'stored value by name', and the context 'from Quire's key-value storage'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'putStorageValue' and 'listStorageEntries'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. However, given the simple nature of the tool and the presence of sibling tools like 'putStorageValue' and 'deleteStorageValue', the usage context is implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.