A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing AI assistants with comprehensive project, task, and subtask management capabilities with project-specific storage.
29
10 npm
88
MIT
Quire MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Quire MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI applications to interact with Jira issues, projects, and workflows through a standardized interface.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Feishu project management systems, allowing retrieval of project views and work items.612MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with TickTick/Dida365 task management API, supporting operations like creating, reading, updating, and deleting tasks and projects.119 npm35MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with ClickUp workspaces, allowing task creation, management, and workspace organization through natural language commands.2113,055 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with Plane.so, allowing them to manage projects and issues through Plane's API for streamlined project management workflows.640MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 61 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource-action combination (e.g., createTask vs createChat, addTaskComment vs addChatComment). Even related tools like createTask/createTaskAfter/createTaskBefore are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent 'quire.{verb}{Resource}' pattern in camelCase (e.g., createTask, listChats, getProject). The verbs (add, create, delete, get, list, search, etc.) are uniform across the set.
Tool Count4/5
With 61 tools, the set is large but justified for a comprehensive project management API covering tasks, chats, documents, organizations, projects, storage, and more. However, it slightly exceeds the typical well-scoped range.
Completeness3/5
The tool surface covers most core operations (CRUD for tasks, chats, documents, statuses, etc.), but notable gaps exist: add/remove project members, create/delete organizations, and other lifecycle management features are missing.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive