chat_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks behavioral details such as error handling, pagination, or side effects. For a simple list operation, it is minimally adequate but would benefit from more disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with no extraneous text. Purpose comes first, followed by parameter details in a clear format.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (list with two parameters) and presence of an output schema, the description is largely complete. Missing details like ordering or error responses are minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning beyond the schema by explaining notebook_id as ID or title alias and noting limit's default. Since schema has no descriptions, this is helpful and covers all parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists chat sessions for a notebook using a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from siblings like chat_get (single chat) or notebook_query (different purpose).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like chat_get. No context about prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.