indicator_divergence_direct

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only says it combines steps but does not disclose important behavioral traits like internal data fetching, side effects, performance, or output format. Minimal transparency for a detection tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey primary function and a value add (difficulty of manual calculation). No redundancy, but could be more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema. Description does not explain return format, error handling, or prerequisites. For a detection tool, users lack context on what the output contains (e.g., list of divergences).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting baseline expectation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it detects RSI divergence (top/bottom) with price in one step. The term 'direct version' differentiates from sister tool indicator_divergence, indicating a combined K-line fetch and detection process.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for direct one-step divergence detection, but no explicit guidance on when to use this vs the non-direct version or other indicators. No when-not-to-use or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.