market_ping
Check connectivity to the Binance futures API. Returns a ping response with timestamp on success.
Instructions
测试期货 API 连通性。成功后返回 { ping: "pong", timestamp }
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check connectivity to the Binance futures API. Returns a ping response with timestamp on success.
测试期货 API 连通性。成功后返回 { ping: "pong", timestamp }
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool succeeds with a specific response, but does not mention failure or error behavior. Acceptable for a simple ping.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence with a clear output description. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Very simple tool with no parameters or output schema. Description adequately covers purpose and output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline score of 4 applies. Description does not need to add meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool tests futures API connectivity and returns a ping-pong response. This is distinct from sibling tools which are all indicators or market data tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description indicates this is for checking connectivity. Does not explicitly state when not to use or alternatives, but the simplicity and zero parameters make the context clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iuk-ink/binance-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server