Skip to main content
Glama
iuk-ink

Binance MCP Server

订单查询

trading_get_order
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve details of a specific Binance futures order by providing either its orderId or origClientOrderId.

Instructions

返回:指定订单详情。orderId 与 origClientOrderId 二选一。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYes
orderIdNo
origClientOrderIdNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv3.0.1
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • removedInput schema / properties / orderId / description
      Removed value: -"系统订单ID"
    • removedInput schema / properties / origClientOrderId / description
      Removed value: -"自定义订单ID"
    • removedInput schema / properties / symbol / description
      Removed value: -"交易对符号 如 BTCUSDT"
  2. Addedv2.0.3

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

注解已提供readOnlyHint=true、openWorldHint=true、idempotentHint=true,安全形态已被覆盖。描述补充了“orderId与origClientOrderId二选一”这一约束,但对获取行为、错误、返回格式等没有额外披露。未与注解矛盾。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述简洁紧凑,两句信息包含“返回结果”和“参数约束”,没有任何冗余内容。虽然可以更规范地改为一个完整句子,但在对效率和切题性上表现良好。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

对于工具的简单参数集合、该描述可一定程度上调用,但缺少“要查询的具体订单需要已知ID”这种应用场景提示,也没有提及返回值的形状或选型或许会因参数不同而异。它仍是“最小可用”而不算完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

模式描述覆盖率为0%,描述承担了部分参数解释:“orderId与origClientOrderId二选一”给出了两个参数的互斥选择关系,这对正确调用很关键。但未说明symbol参数、orderId的取值范围语义或origClientOrderId的格式,未完全弥补schema的空白。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述以明确的动词“返回”加资源“指定订单详情”表明这是按订单ID查询订单详情的工具。通过“指定订单”与“orderId/origClientOrderId”可以看出它与其他订单列表类工具(open_orders/order_history)区分,虽然未明确点名兄弟工具。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述没有说明何时使用此工具而不是trading_open_orders、trading_order_orders等替代方案。除“二选一”的参数约束外,没有给出明确的使用场景、前置条件或排除条件。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iuk-ink/binance-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server