Create Golden Config Tree

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) but not destructive (destructiveHint=false). The description adds useful context about the resource being created (hierarchical templates, variable substitution, version management), but does not disclose other behavioral traits such as validation, idempotency, or what happens on duplicate names.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded. The first sentence states the primary action clearly, and the second provides necessary background without redundancy. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core purpose and high-level capabilities. Given that an output schema exists and annotations are present, the description is sufficiently complete for a create operation, though it could mention related tools for post-creation steps (e.g., adding nodes) for even richer context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% parameter description coverage, so the description's job is light. The description does mention variable substitution, which relates to the 'variables' parameter, but it does not add specific meaning beyond the schema's existing per-parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb and resource: 'Create a new Golden Configuration tree'. It also explains what Golden Configuration trees are, which distinguishes this tool from sibling create tools for other resource types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by explaining the purpose and context, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any exclusions or preconditions. Sibling tools like add_golden_config_node and get_golden_config_trees are not referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.