Skip to main content
Glama
itential

Itential MCP Server

Official
by itential

Related Servers

Alternatives to Itential MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to retrieve structured network information, including routing, interfaces, MPLS, and topology, from devices using gNMI and OpenConfig models. It facilitates real-time network analysis, log filtering, and status monitoring through a standardized interface.
      10
      14
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for network operations that lets AI assistants interact with Cisco/Juniper network devices through safe, well-defined tools like compliance audits and configuration backups.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes live network monitoring data as Resources and diagnostic capabilities as Tools, letting AI assistants query network health conversationally.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 78 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping or indistinguishable purposes: get_gateways and get_services share the same description; get_task_metrics has four filtered variants; get_job_metrics has two; and trigger_automation vs start_workflow overlap explicitly. While many tools target distinct resources, the volume of near-duplicate metrics and listing tools makes selection error-prone.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow verb_noun snake_case (e.g., get_devices, create_template, run_compliance_plan, update_command_template). Minor length differences do not break the pattern, and there are no camelCase or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count1/5

    78 tools is far beyond the practical 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ extreme mismatch threshold. The breadth of the platform does not justify such a large, flat tool surface for an agent.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers many platform areas but has notable gaps: several resources support create/get/update but lack delete (templates, command templates, device groups, golden config trees), and workflows/agents have no create/delete tools. Core monitoring and execution paths exist, but lifecycle coverage is uneven.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive