Skip to main content
Glama
illodev

@illodev/taiga-mcp

taiga_userstories_bulk_create

Create multiple user stories at once by providing project ID and newline-separated subjects. Streamlines data entry for Taiga projects.

Instructions

Bulk create user stories.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
status_idNo
project_idYesProject ID
bulk_storiesYesNewline-separated user story subjects
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavioral traits. It only states 'Bulk create user stories,' which merely restates the function name and reveals nothing about return values, side effects, error handling, or required context. This is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of a single sentence with no wasted words, and the key action is front-loaded. However, it is so brief that it borders on under-specification, though for sheer efficiency it works well.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 3 parameters, 2 required, and no output schema or annotations, so a concise but informative description is essential. This description fails to mention the role of status_id, what the tool returns, or how batch creation behaves on partial failure, making it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents project_id and bulk_stories (67% coverage), but the description adds no parameter information. It does not explain the optional status_id parameter, which is undocumented in both the schema and description, nor does it clarify the expected format of bulk_stories beyond what the schema already says.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb phrase 'Bulk create' and identifies the resource as 'user stories', clearly conveying that this tool creates multiple user stories at once. This distinguishes it from the single-userstory creation tool (taiga_userstories_create) and other bulk operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives such as taiga_userstories_create. The word 'bulk' implies it is for batch creation, but there is no stated criterion for when to use it, no prerequisites, and no mention of what differentiates it from other bulk create tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/illodev/taiga-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server