taiga_task_custom_attributes_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'update' with no mention of required permissions, whether the update is partial or full, side effects, or error behavior. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clearly worded sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the verb and resource, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too terse for a tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema. It omits essential information such as which fields are updatable, whether it's a partial update, and any prerequisites or side effects. An agent would need to rely on the sibling tools or external documentation to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers only 20% of parameters with descriptions (only id). The description does not list or explain any of the updatable fields (name, type, order, description), leaving the agent to infer their meaning from the parameter names alone. This does not compensate for the schema's low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update) and the resource (custom attribute definition for task). The word 'definition' distinguishes it from the sibling tool that updates attribute values (taiga_task_custom_attributes_values_update). It also specifies 'task' to differentiate from epic/userstory custom attribute updates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. It does not mention that it modifies the definition as opposed to values, nor does it reference any sibling tools for context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.