Skip to main content
Glama
ideook

Revit MCP Server

by ideook
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Revit MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-freecad

      jango-blockchained
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This project provides a robust integration between AI assistants and FreeCAD CAD software using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows external applications to interact with FreeCAD through a standardized interface, offering multiple connection methods and specialized tools.
      25
      MIT

    • Revit MCP Server

      ZedMoster
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python package that enables integration with Autodesk Revit through the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to send commands to Revit and automate interactions with building models.
      27
      84 PyPI
      39
      MIT

    • BlenderMCP

      mikeysrecipes
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Blender to Claude AI through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling prompt-assisted 3D modeling, scene creation, and manipulation.
      17
      MIT

    • BlenderMCP

      ujs204
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Blender to Claude AI through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling prompt-assisted 3D modeling, scene creation, and manipulation directly from Claude.
      17
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have clear purposes but significant overlap exists. For example, get_current_view_elements and ai_element_filter both retrieve elements, with the latter being more intelligent but potentially redundant. Similarly, operate_element includes delete functionality that overlaps with delete_element, and get_current_document_info and get_current_view_info appear identical in description, causing confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_line_based_element, delete_element, get_selected_elements), which is clear and predictable. However, there are minor deviations like open_document (lacks verb) and send_code_to_revit (uses 'to' instead of underscore), slightly breaking the pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the count is well-scoped for a Revit MCP server covering element creation, querying, deletion, and operations. Each tool serves a distinct role in the domain, and the number is neither too sparse nor overwhelming for typical Revit workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong coverage for core Revit operations, including CRUD for elements (create, delete), querying (get, filter), and specialized actions like tagging and coding. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of update tools for modifying existing elements beyond color or transparency, but agents can work around this using existing tools like operate_element.

    Resources