create-menu

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Create' implies a write operation, but the description does not disclose side effects, required permissions, ability/idempotency concerns, or return values. This leaves the agent unaware of important behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is efficiently written, but it may be too sparse to be considered fully well-rounded. It earns its place by stating the core action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one required parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficiently complete. The agent has no information about the structure or required fields of the 'menu' object, nor what the response will look like. The context is too minimal for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not provide any explanation of the 'menu' parameter. The input schema only defines it as an object with additionalProperties allowed, offering no structure or examples. The description adds no value in clarifying what the menu object should contain, failing to compensate for the schema's lack of detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'UI menu', distinguishing it from sibling tools like update-menu, delete-menu, and get-menu. It is specific enough to identify the tool's function, though it lacks additional scope or detail about what kind of UI menu or its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions. Sibling tools exist but no cross-references are provided, leaving the agent without direction on contextual selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.