backup-topology-ui-config
Back up the topology UI configuration to protect current settings and allow restoration when needed.
Instructions
Backup the topology UI configuration.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Back up the topology UI configuration to protect current settings and allow restoration when needed.
Backup the topology UI configuration.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior, but it only says 'backup' without explaining what that entails: whether it creates a snapshot, overwrites previous backups, requires existing configuration, or returns any confirmation. The operational behavior is entirely opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and resource. It contains no fluff or redundant phrasing, earning full marks for conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description still omits essential context: what backup means, where the backup is stored, how to verify success, or whether the operation is reversible. An agent cannot fully anticipate the tool's behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and the schema is empty, so the description has no parameter information to add. Baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description does not need to compensate for schema gaps.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Backup' and names the resource 'topology UI configuration', clearly distinguishing it from the sibling 'restore-topology-ui-config'. It unambiguously states the tool's function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No information is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives, when it should be invoked (e.g., before updates), or any exclusions. The name implies a backup operation but no explicit guidance is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ibm-client-engineering/concert-operate-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server