Skip to main content
Glama
hieutachi

rosbridge-mcp

by hieutachi

Related Servers

Alternatives to rosbridge-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM coding agents to inspect, control, and verify remote ROS2 robotics applications without a local ROS2 installation, supporting topics, services, actions, parameters, TF transforms, and automated test suites.
      16
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables control of ROS/ROS2 robots through natural language commands by translating LLM instructions into ROS topics and services. Supports cross-platform WebSocket-based communication with existing robot systems without requiring code modifications.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to interact with ROS2 robotics systems through natural language commands. Supports topic publishing/subscribing, service calls, message analysis, and auto-discovery of ROS2 interfaces for debugging and controlling robots.
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables large language models to interact with ROS robots seamlessly, allowing natural language control, real-time sensor monitoring, and autonomous task execution without modifying existing robot code.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables controlling robots in ROS environments through natural language, supporting topics, services, actions, and GUI tools.
      24
      36
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation in the ROS ecosystem: listing resources, reading topic data, publishing, calling services, managing action goals, retrieving TF and camera data, and checking connection status. There is no overlap, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but use a mix of verbs: 'list_' for discovery, 'get_' for retrieval, and 'publish_', 'call_', 'send_', 'cancel_' for actions. While all are descriptive and readable, the lack of a single unified prefix across all tools keeps it from being a perfect 5.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for a ROS bridge interface. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of ROS interaction (topics, services, actions, TF, camera), and the number is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: discovery, reading and writing topics, calling services, managing actions, and retrieving transforms and images. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool to list available actions, but this can be partially achieved via list_services or documentation.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive