Get Project Versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The only annotation is readOnlyHint=true, which already tells the agent this is a safe read operation. The description adds no behavioral detail beyond the read-only nature, such as permissions, rate limits, or output scope. It simply restates the action, adding minimal value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the core action and object, and contains no filler. It is appropriately sized for a tool with one parameter and a clear purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, output schema exists), the description covers the essential function. It doesn't elaborate on edge cases or define 'fix versions', but for a basic read operation it is sufficient. A small gap remains in not mentioning any required permissions or the fact that it returns both released and unreleased versions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already thoroughly describes the only parameter (project_key) with pattern and example. The description's phrase 'for a specific Jira project' only restates this, so the baseline of 3 applies as the schema carries the parameter-semantic burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and identifies the resource 'all fix versions' with a clear scope 'for a specific Jira project'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like jira_create_version and jira_update_version, which are mutations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need to retrieve versions for a project, but it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternative tools. It lacks exclusions or alternative guidance, so usage is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.