Batch Create Versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only 'destructiveHint: false' in annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It states the creation action but does not mention possible partial failures, idempotency, validation rules, or any side effects. It adds minimal value beyond the annotations themselves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that is easily scannable and avoids unnecessary words. It does not waste space, though it could benefit from slightly more detail about the batch behavior without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a batch operation, the tool has inherent complexity (e.g., handling of multiple versions, potential partial failures) that is not addressed. The presence of an output schema may cover return values, but the description alone leaves gaps in understanding the operational context, especially given minimal annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the detailed parameter descriptions for 'project_key' and 'versions' already do the heavy lifting. The description adds no additional parameter semantics, which is acceptable per the baseline but no extra credit is warranted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Batch create') and a clear resource ('versions in a Jira project'). It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'jira_create_version' by emphasizing the batch/multiple aspect, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating multiple versions at once, providing clear context for when to use this batch tool. However, it does not explicitly mention when to prefer the singular 'jira_create_version' or alternative approaches, so it falls just short of a perfect score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.