Skip to main content
Glama
hhopke
by hhopke

icu_get_workouts_in_folder

Read-onlyIdempotent

List all workouts from a specific library folder or training plan, with details like name, type, structure, training load, and intensity factor.

Instructions

List the workouts stored in one specific library folder or training plan — name, type, structure, training load, intensity factor.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
folder_idYesFolder ID to get workouts from
athlete_idNoAthlete ID (for coaches managing multiple athletes)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv5.0.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / athlete_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Athlete ID (for coaches managing multiple athletes)"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the returned attribute set, but says nothing about pagination, ordering, or whether an empty folder returns an empty list — modest added value on top of structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence: verb, scope, then the attribute list. Nothing is padded or repeated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and annotations carry the safety profile, so the description need not explain return values; it names the key fields anyway. What remains thin is the absence of any guidance on folder-vs-training-plan IDs or result volume, but nothing critical for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are documented structurally, giving a baseline of 3. The description contributes only the nuance that folder_id may also denote a training plan, which the schema does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (list) and resource (workouts in a library folder or training plan), plus the fields returned. It scopes to one specific folder, which loosely separates it from icu_get_workout_library, but it never names or contrasts that sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance and no alternative named. The phrase 'one specific library folder or training plan' implies you must already know the folder/plan ID, but the agent is left to infer whether this or icu_get_workout_library is the right call.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools