icu_create_gear_reminder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=true). The description 'Create' aligns with this, but no additional behavioral traits (e.g., what happens if reminder already exists, rate limits, side effects) are disclosed beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no fluff. It is concise, though it could be slightly expanded to include a note about the required gear_id without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple 4-parameter schema with full descriptions and an output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and usage. It may lack an explicit note that the gear must exist, but the schema's required 'gear_id' implies that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters have schema descriptions (100% coverage), and the tool description summarizes the trigger mechanism ('triggered by distance, time, or both'), which adds meaningful context beyond the schema. However, it doesn't elaborate on parameter constraints (e.g., units for distance_alert).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb ('Create'), resource ('maintenance reminder for a gear item'), and trigger conditions ('distance, time, or both'). It naturally distinguishes from sibling tools like 'icu_update_gear_reminder' and 'icu_create_gear'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage context (e.g., to set a reminder triggered by distance/time) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites like that the gear must already exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.