xingce-solver
Related Servers
Alternatives to xingce-solver
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Chinese bar exam (法考) preparation with 2,027 past questions, chapter exercises, and spaced repetition. Enables AI agents to search, practice, and review legal exam questions.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA structured problem-solving MCP server that breaks down complex tasks into sequential steps, supports iterative refinement and branching, and helps maintain context and explore alternative reasoning paths.141 npm42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server that implements sequential thinking protocols, provides structured problem-solving methods, decomposes complex problems into manageable steps, and supports iterative optimization and alternative reasoning paths.12Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying the Keqing customer service knowledge base, enabling AI agents to search structured knowledge entries and retrieve authoritative, citable answers.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for step-by-step mathematical reasoning and planning, enabling AI agents to execute calculations and perform GUI actions like opening PowerPoint.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceThis server facilitates structured problem-solving by breaking down complex issues into sequential steps, supporting revisions, and enabling multiple solution paths through full MCP integration.556 PyPI950MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but classify_question and route_xingce_question overlap slightly in routing, and compose_xingce_analysis_prompt vs compose_xingce_answer_prompt could confuse agents without careful reading. Overall, descriptions help disambiguate.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., classify_question, get_analogy_reasoning_scaffold, solve_data_analysis). No mixed conventions.
With 15 tools, the set is well-scoped for the domain of question routing, scaffolding, and solving. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is within the 3-15 ideal range.
The set covers routing, prompt composition, and scaffolds for six reasoning types, but only two solve draft tools (data analysis and logic reasoning) exist. Missing solve tools for analogy, definition, graphic, etc., leaving agents to work around these gaps.