Scaffold a Go module

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool creates files and runs a build verification. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden and does so adequately, though it could mention overwrite behavior or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 12-word sentence that front-loads the main action. Every word adds value, with no fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential action and verification step. However, it does not mention what happens if the directory already exists or if the build fails. Given no output schema, it provides sufficient context for a simple scaffold tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage with descriptions for each parameter. The tool description adds no additional parameter information beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'Go module', and specifies 'a minimal main.go' and verification of the build. It distinguishes from sibling tools like scaffold_nextjs and scaffold_ts_lib by targeting Go.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Usage is implied by the purpose, but there are no conditions or prerequisites mentioned, such as requiring Go to be installed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.