List Coolify apps
coolify_appsList applications managed by Coolify with their name, status, and UUID.
Instructions
List applications managed by Coolify (name, status, uuid).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
coolify_appsList applications managed by Coolify with their name, status, and UUID.
List applications managed by Coolify (name, status, uuid).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description discloses basic behavior (lists apps, returns fields). For a simple read-only operation, this is sufficient; no hidden side effects or auth needs mentioned but none expected.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 11 words, front-loaded with verb and resource, no fluff. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fully covers purpose and behavior. No additional context needed for this simple list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 0 parameters, so schema description coverage is 100%. Description adds value by indicating the returned fields beyond the schema, which is helpful despite no parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'List', resource 'applications managed by Coolify', and specifies returned fields (name, status, uuid). Distinguishes from siblings like coolify_deploy and coolify_resources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Implied by name, but lacks context such as 'use this for initial listing; for details on a specific app, use coolify_resources'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/haydary1986/fleet-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server