Cloudflare zone status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden. It uses 'Show' implying a read-only operation, which is clear. However, it does not explicitly state that it does not modify data or discuss authentication requirements beyond the account parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words, efficiently communicating the core function. The key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with full schema coverage, the description is complete. It tells what the tool does, the key input (domain), and the outputs (status, plan, nameservers) implicitly. No output schema is present, so the description suffices.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The tool description adds 'by domain name' reinforcing the domain parameter's purpose, but does not significantly exceed the schema in explaining parameter meaning or usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool shows a zone's status, plan, and nameservers by domain name, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like cf_dns_add or cf_dns_list which deal with DNS records, not zone info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for checking zone details, but does not explicitly state when to use vs. alternatives or provide exclusion criteria. No guidance on prerequisites or context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.