Skip to main content
Glama

reports_project_attention

Retrieve alerts and items requiring attention for a project, helping identify issues and prioritise actions within a specified timeframe.

Instructions

Get alerts and items needing attention for a specific project.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYes
sprintIdNo
startDateNoYYYY-MM-DD
endDateNoYYYY-MM-DD
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not state that the tool is read-only, describe side effects, or indicate rate limits. The minimal description offers no transparency beyond the basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. However, it is too brief to be fully effective, but conciseness is not penalized for under-specificity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the behavior, parameter relationships, or return format, leaving significant gaps for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (only startDate and endDate have descriptions). The description does not add any meaning to the parameters; projectId is required but unexplained. The tool description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves alerts and items needing attention for a specific project. It distinguishes from sibling report tools like 'reports_attention' and 'reports_project', though it could be more specific about what constitutes alerts and items.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/harrynguyen14/vtrack-api-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server