notifications_mark_read
Mark a specific notification as read by providing its ID to update its status in VTrack.
Instructions
Mark a specific notification as read.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID |
Mark a specific notification as read by providing its ID to update its status in VTrack.
Mark a specific notification as read.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description states the action but does not disclose side effects, reversibility, or permission requirements. Adequate for a simple write operation but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Front-loaded with action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one required parameter and no output schema. Description adequately covers the operation; missing usage hints but sufficient for such a simple action.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the single 'id' parameter described as 'Notification ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (mark read) and the resource (specific notification). It distinguishes from sibling tools notifications_list (lists) and notifications_mark_all_read (marks all).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this vs alternatives such as notifications_mark_all_read. Does not specify prerequisites or context for invoking.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/harrynguyen14/vtrack-api-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server