Meme MCP Server
Servidor Meme MCP
Un servidor simple de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) para generar memes mediante la API ImgFlip. Este servidor permite que los modelos y herramientas de IA generen imágenes de memes a partir de las indicaciones del usuario.
Herramientas
El servidor implementa la siguiente única herramienta llamada generateMeme .
La herramienta acepta los siguientes parámetros:
templateNumericId: el ID numérico de la plantilla de meme a utilizar.text0: El texto para el primer marcador de posición.text1: El texto para el segundo marcador de posición.
Related MCP server: MCP TemplateIO
Uso
Puedes configurar el servidor generador de memes en tu cliente usando el paquete NPM meme-mcp . Aquí tienes un ejemplo de configuración para Claude Desktop (Configuración -> Desarrollador -> Editar configuración):
{
"mcpServers": {
"meme": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "meme-mcp"],
"env": {
"IMGFLIP_USERNAME": "<IMGFLIP USERNAME>",
"IMGFLIP_PASSWORD": "<IMGFLIP PASSWORD>"
}
}
}
}Nota: necesita crear una cuenta gratuita en ImgFlip para obtener su nombre de usuario y contraseña.
Solución de problemas
A veces, Claude Desktop no encuentra la versión correcta de npx (especialmente si usas NVM; consulta este problema para más detalles). En ese caso, puedes instalar meme-mcp manualmente y usarlo directamente.
npm install -g meme-mcpPuedes encontrar la ruta del ejecutable de tu node ejecutando which node en tu terminal. Después, tu configuración debería verse así:
{
"mcpServers": {
"meme": {
"command": "/Users/<USERNAME>/.nvm/versions/node/v20.18.2/bin/node",
"args": ["/Users/<USERNAME>/.nvm/versions/node/v20.18.2/lib/node_modules/meme-mcp/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"IMGFLIP_USERNAME": "<IMGFLIP USERNAME>",
"IMGFLIP_PASSWORD": "<IMGFLIP PASSWORD>"
}
}
}
}Ejemplo
Después de configurar Claude Desktop, reinícialo y verás el pequeño icono del martillo en la esquina inferior derecha del chat. Puedes pedirle a Claude que te genere un meme.

Autor
Este proyecto fue creado por Vladimir Haltakov para divertirse. Si te parece interesante, puedes escribirme a @haltakov .
Available Tools
1 toolgenerateMemeC
Generate a meme image from Imgflip using the numeric template id and text
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| templateNumericId | Yes | ||
| text0 | Yes | ||
| text1 | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions generating a meme image but fails to describe key behaviors such as whether this is a read-only or mutating operation, potential rate limits, authentication needs, or what the output looks like (e.g., image URL or data). This leaves significant gaps in understanding the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the core action and includes essential details (source and inputs), making it highly concise and well-structured for quick comprehension.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (3 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It lacks details on parameter meanings, behavioral traits, output format, and usage context. For a tool that generates external content, more information is needed to guide effective use, making it inadequate for the context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no descriptions for the three parameters. The description adds minimal semantics by naming the parameters ('numeric template id and text'), but it doesn't explain what 'templateNumericId', 'text0', or 'text1' represent, their formats, or examples. This insufficiently compensates for the lack of schema documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Generate a meme image') and the resource ('from Imgflip'), specifying the verb and target. It mentions the required inputs (template id and text), making the purpose specific. However, without sibling tools, it doesn't need to differentiate from alternatives, so it falls short of a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or context for its application. It simply states what the tool does without indicating appropriate scenarios or limitations, leaving the agent with minimal usage direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- First observed
generateMeme
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The tool name uses camelCase, which is consistent within itself.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Meme MCP Server', which suggests a broader scope for meme-related operations. This minimal set limits functionality and feels incomplete for the domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for meme generation. It only offers generation via a specific template ID, lacking operations like listing templates, searching memes, editing, or managing meme content, which are typical for such a domain.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for meme generation, template search, caption rendering, and AI meme creation.
Imgflip MCP — wraps Imgflip API (free, no auth for template listing)
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
MCP server for Qwen Image 3 AI image generation
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides image generation capabilities using the Ideogram API, allowing users to create images from text prompts with customizable parameters.19 npm5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides an image generation tool using Templated.io, allowing users to create customized images based on templates with text and image layers.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models and tools to generate meme images from user prompts using the ImgFlip API.17Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA template implementation of the Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Mem0 to provide AI agents with persistent memory capabilities for storing, retrieving, and searching memories using semantic search.MIT