Unifi AP MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Unifi AP MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing UniFi Network Controllers, providing tools to read and modify network configurations, clients, devices, events, diagnostics, and backups via API key.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing typed, safety-gated access to UniFi Network consoles via the official API, enabling management of devices, clients, networks, WiFi, firewall policies, and more.1624 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for self-hosted UniFi gateway management, providing tools for devices, networks, WiFi, firewall rules, switch port profiles, connected clients, and a one-shot IoT network creation with rollback.22MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server and CLI for UniFi Network controllers: clients, devices, WLANs, firewall, and health over stdio or streamable HTTP, with auth.4AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for UniFi Network Controller enabling AI assistants to manage UniFi infrastructure via natural language. It supports firewall rules, IPv6, and uses lazy/eager tool modes to minimize context usage.5Mozilla Public 2.0
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceTurns your UniFi Network Controller into programmable tools for querying and modifying network settings via MCP.-
TDQS
Scored across 51 tools
While most tools are distinct per resource, client management has significant overlap (e.g., unifi_authorize_guest vs unifi_client_action with AUTHORIZE_GUEST; unifi_get_all_users vs unifi_list_known_clients; unifi_block_client and unifi_unblock_client vs unifi_update_known_client's block option). This could confuse an agent.
All tools follow a consistent 'unifi_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., unifi_create_firewall_group, unifi_delete_wlan). Verbs are clear and uniform (list, get, create, delete, update, etc.), making the set predictable.
51 tools is high. While the domain (UniFi network management) is complex, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., client actions). The count feels slightly bloated but still manageable with good grouping.
Covers most essential resources (networks, WLANs, firewall, clients, devices) with CRUD. Missing: ability to update device settings or create/delete sites. Minor gaps that agents can work around.