Skip to main content
Glama
groundplane-studio

fusion-electronics-mcp

by groundplane-studio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to fusion-electronics-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • KiCAD MCP Server

      Avinash1286
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with KiCAD for PCB design automation, including schematic editing, component placement, routing, DRC/ERC, and export.
      100
      14 npm
      1
      MIT

    • pcb-mcp

      Amagtoto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and modify KiCAD PCB designs through the KiCAD IPC API, providing tools for board queries, footprint placement, track creation, DRC, and export.
      14
      MIT

    • jlceda-mcp

      qcz2943
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with 嘉立创 EDA for PCB design tasks including project management, component libraries, rule checking, and manufacturing constraints.
      18 npm
      -

    • KiCad MCP Server

      brovk2008
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to inspect, edit, analyze, and render PCB layouts in real-time using the KiCad IPC API, providing tools for board configuration, footprints, tracks, zones, nets, text, shapes, dimensions, exports, screenshots, and CLI automation.
      100
      1
      MIT

    • jlceda-mcp-server

      hyl64
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to control JLCPCB EDA for PCB automation, exposing 39 tools for component manipulation, routing, copper pour, DRC, and more. Includes a built-in PCB agent for orchestrating multi-step tasks.
      59
      237
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 77 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tool set has several overlapping families—routing (route_trace/route_net/route_close/route_remaining/autoroute), via placement (add_via/stitch_vias/fanout_pad/ground_vias/clean_vias), and schematic checks (run_erc/review_schematic)—so an agent must rely on detailed descriptions to choose correctly. Most tools target distinct resources/actions, but the boundaries between workflow steps are not always self-evident.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case and follow a predictable verb_noun or verb_phrase pattern (list_parts, get_net, add_via, route_trace). Minor single-word names (undo, autoroute) and noun phrases (routing_status) are consistent with the overall convention, with no mixed casing or verb styles.

    Tool Count1/5

    77 tools is far beyond the typical 3–15 range and matches the rubric’s 50+ extreme-mismatch anchor. Although the domain is broad, many tools are granular variants (multiple routers, multiple via placers, three KiCad importers) that could be consolidated with mode parameters, increasing selection cost for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers design creation, schematic capture, board layout, routing, pours, DRC/ERC, fabrication exports, library management, 3D, and KiCad import—very comprehensive. However, targeted deletion tools are missing for parts, nets, pours, keepouts, holes, and text, and there is no create-library operation; undo offers rollback but not direct removal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources