ClawDaddy MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full disclosure burden. Effectively documents return values (availability status, pricing, registration details) and auth requirements. Missing rate limits, caching behavior, or error handling specifics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose and returns. Final sentence ('Powered by ClawDaddy.app...') is marketing fluff that wastes space without aiding agent decision-making; otherwise efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Appropriate for a simple single-parameter lookup tool. Compensates for missing output schema by describing return values. Minor gap: could clarify relationship to purchase_domain workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter description including examples. Description does not add semantics beyond schema (format rules, validation), so baseline 3 applies per scoring rules.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb 'Check' combined with clear resource 'domain availability for registration'. Distinguishes from sibling purchase_domain (this verifies, that buys) and get_domain_info (this queries unregistered status, that queries owned domains).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions 'No authentication required' which constrains usage context, but lacks explicit when-to-use guidance like 'Use before purchase_domain' or comparison to get_domain_info/get_quote siblings that might overlap in functionality.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.