ClawDaddy MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full disclosure burden but only notes the authentication requirement (already documented in schema). Fails to disclose read-only/safe nature, return format, or error behaviors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences with no redundancy. Front-loaded with the primary action, though slightly terse given the lack of behavioral annotations that require compensatory description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Acceptable for a simple 2-parameter read operation with full schema coverage, but lacks return value description which would be helpful since no output schema exists to document the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% description coverage for both parameters. The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the schema, merely confirming the token requirement in prose rather than adding syntax guidance or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States specific verb (Get), resource (nameservers), and scope (for a domain). Clear and direct, though does not explicitly differentiate from sibling 'get_domain_info' which may overlap in functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions authentication requirement ('Requires management token'), but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_domain_info' or 'set_nameservers', nor any exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.