ClawDaddy MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It effectively discloses the pricing structure breakdown (base price, service fee, total), promotional context ('Lobster Launch Special'), and payment rail (Stripe). Minor gap: does not mention quote expiration, idempotency, or whether quotes are binding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste. First sentence establishes purpose and scope; second sentence details the quote contents and payment mechanism. Every clause adds value beyond the structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately complete for a single-parameter tool without output schema. Describes what the quote contains (monetary breakdown) which substitutes for return value documentation. Missing only minor details like quote TTL or currency.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with 'domain' fully described in the schema including format example. The description appropriately focuses on behavior rather than repeating parameter documentation, meeting the baseline for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') with clear resource ('purchase quote') and scope ('final pricing'). It clearly distinguishes from siblings: 'purchase_domain' implies actual transaction, while this is pricing inquiry; DNS tools (add/delete/update_dns_record) imply configuration, not commerce.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Establishes clear context that this is for pricing discovery ('quote includes base price, service fee...total cost') and mentions payment method, distinguishing it from actual purchase execution. However, it does not explicitly state 'use this before purchase_domain' or 'this does not commit to purchase', so it lacks explicit workflow sequencing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.