get_tenant_settings
Retrieve tenant settings, including the send function ON/OFF status, to verify current configuration.
Instructions
テナント設定 (送信機能 ON/OFF) を取得。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve tenant settings, including the send function ON/OFF status, to verify current configuration.
テナント設定 (送信機能 ON/OFF) を取得。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the tool gets settings but does not disclose authentication requirements, error behavior, or what happens if settings are missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and efficient. Every word contributes to the purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description is minimal but adequate. It lacks details about the return format and any other settings beyond the send function.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds some meaning by specifying 'send function ON/OFF' but does not fully explain the return structure or other possible settings.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves tenant settings, specifically the send function ON/OFF. It is a specific verb-resource pair and distinct from sibling tools dealing with invoices and quotes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not provide context about prerequisites or exclusion conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gooodbilling/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server