Skip to main content
Glama
google

Chrome Enterprise Premium MCP Server

Official
by google

Related Servers

Alternatives to Chrome Enterprise Premium MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to control a real Google Chrome instance using specific user profiles, cookies, and extensions. It provides 18 tools for browser navigation, element interaction, and page inspection via the Chrome DevTools Protocol.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI models with full browser automation capabilities through Chrome. It enables navigation, interaction, screenshots, and complete DevTools access by bridging AI clients with a companion Chrome extension.
      99
      12 npm
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that provides seamless integration between Chrome bookmarks and AI assistants. This server enables AI models to access, search, analyze, and manage Chrome bookmarks through a standardized protocol.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Google Cloud Platform environments through natural language, allowing users to query and manage GCP resources during conversations.
      9
      1,504 npm
      200
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (auth, DLP rules, detectors, browser management). However, there is slight overlap between some diagnostic tools (diagnose_environment, security_insights) and multiple DLP-related tools (create_chrome_dlp_rule, create_default_dlp_rules, list_dlp_rules, get_dlp_rule) could confuse an agent, though descriptions help differentiate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_cep_subscription, create_chrome_dlp_rule, list_dlp_rules). Even auth tools use cep_auth as a prefix. No mixing of camelCase or other conventions, making it predictable for an agent.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 25 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal range (3-15). While all tools serve a purpose in Chrome Enterprise Premium management, the count feels a bit heavy, especially with many DLP and detector tools. Still, it remains manageable and not overly bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers core operations like listing, creating, and checking licenses, but there are notable gaps: no tools to update or delete DLP rules, and no OU management beyond listing. Agents will hit dead ends when trying to modify or remove existing configurations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive