Skip to main content
Glama
glatinone

Secops Toolkit MCP

by glatinone

Related Servers

Alternatives to Secops Toolkit MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a 60+ tool security and threat-intel stack to AI agents, enabling secret scanning, Sigma rule generation, ransomware lookup, OSINT, and deep research.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server providing 35 utility tools for AI agents including text analysis, encoding, hashing, password generation, JSON/CSV/XML parsing, regex, color, date, finance, URL metadata, SEO tags, DNS lookup, SSL inspection, and JWT decoding. Free, zero-dependency, and works with any MCP client.
      35
      24 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that extracts Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) from unstructured text and checks their reputation across multiple threat intelligence services. It enables real-time analysis of IPs, domains, hashes, and URLs, providing enriched context for security workflows within LLMs.
      5
      20 PyPI
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A minimal, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents three real, read-only security-orchestration tools: cve_lookup, shodan_host_lookup, and nuclei_scan.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for offensive-security tooling, enabling AI agents to run reconnaissance, CVE intelligence, JavaScript analysis, HTTP probing, and port scanning against authorized targets.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing 15 OSINT tools over free, public sources for AI agents, enabling domain reconnaissance, subdomain discovery, DNS lookups, host profiling, CVE search, and more without API keys.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: IOC handling (defang/refang/extract), hashing, password entropy, CIDR operations, shell command assessment, and repo scanning. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case, but naming pattern varies between verb_noun (extract_iocs, scan_repo_root) and noun_noun (password_entropy, cidr_info). Mostly consistent but minor mixing.

    Tool Count5/5

    9 tools cover a broad range of secops tasks without being excessive. Each tool adds value, and the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core secops areas: IOC handling, hashing, password analysis, CIDR, shell assessment, repo scanning. Minor gaps like URL analysis missing, but no critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues