Skip to main content
Glama
ginsonko

ap-aesthetics

by ginsonko

Related Servers

Alternatives to ap-aesthetics

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables prototyping, running, and evaluating typed judgment questions against TypeSafe's Jev model, including accuracy, calibration, and threshold analysis.
      3
      83 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a measured reading pipeline for AI readers of historical handwritten and typed records, with tools for inspection, evidence extraction, comparison, and Brier-scored calibration.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only analysis of intracortical spike-level brain-computer-interface recordings, including signal quality, spike detection, firing rates, and cursor-velocity decoding from local or streamed datasets.
      24
      52 PyPI
      1
      Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables walk-forward analysis of trading strategies by computing Walk-Forward Efficiency ratios, scoring parameter surfaces for fragile curve-fit spikes versus robust plateaus, auditing whether parameters were genuinely locked after optimization, and generating correctly non-overlapping rolling in-sample/out-of-sample windows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a controlled interface for Bayesian Marketing Mix Modeling, letting AI agents validate datasets, fit and diagnose MMMs, analyze channel contributions and ROI, simulate and optimize budgets, calibrate with lift tests, and cross-validate models—all with statistical verification, uncertainty reporting, and full provenance.
      33
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct verb+object focus: evaluate vs compare vs sensitivity vs audience_panel are separable evaluation modes, and fit/apply/tune form distinguishable calibration steps. Mild overlap among the evaluation tools (ap_evaluate, ap_compare, ap_sensitivity) is resolved by explicit descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names share a consistent ap_ prefix and are snake_case, but the pattern mixes noun forms (ap_catalog, ap_template, ap_audience_panel, ap_sensitivity) with verb-based forms (ap_evaluate, ap_fit_calibration, ap_tune_parameters). Readable and predictable overall, just not uniformly verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each maps to a distinct capability in the evaluation/calibration pipeline. No redundant or filler tools are apparent.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a full workflow: reference lookup, templating, evaluation, comparison, panel, sensitivity, dataset inspection, and fit/apply/tune calibration. Minor gaps around persistence/export of results, but core lifecycle is intact.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues