Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
get-mcp-ads

Google Ads by Get MCP Ads

by get-mcp-ads
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

google ads health check

google_ads_health_check
Read-onlyIdempotent

Run a read-only check to verify Google Ads credentials, API access, login customer visibility, and API version, returning actionable warnings without exposing secrets.

Instructions

Read-only connectivity check. Verifies credential presence, Google Ads API access, login customer visibility, API version, and actionable warnings without returning secrets.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesOriginal tool result: parsed JSON when the text is JSON, otherwise the text or multiple MCP content blocks. Provider fields depend on the selected query.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.1.1
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "additionalProperties": true,
-    "properties": {},
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  {
-    "items": {},
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "number"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "items": {},
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "number"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "boolean"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]
  2. First observedv2.0.1

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and open-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description still adds real value by naming the specific diagnostics performed and explicitly promising no secrets are returned, which is the key trust concern for a credential-verifying tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the read-only nature and followed by the concrete checklist. Nothing is padded and no sentence restates the name alone.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and no parameters, the description need not explain return values, and it lists the full set of checks. The one small gap is failure semantics — whether a failed check raises an error or is reported as a structured warning — though 'actionable warnings' hints at the latter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline 4 applies. The description correctly does not waste space on argument semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('verifies') and enumerates the exact checks performed: credential presence, API access, login customer visibility, API version, and warnings. It is immediately distinguishable from every sibling, all of which fetch advertising data rather than diagnose connectivity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'connectivity check' implies it should be run before data calls or when auth/access failures occur, but the description never states when to use it, when not to, or that the other google_ads_* tools are the alternative once the check passes. Usage is inferred rather than prescribed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools