Skip to main content
Glama

getUrlFilterBlacklist

Get the MAC-based deny (blacklist) filter entries for a site (paginated). Returns MAC addresses blocked from network access.

Instructions

Get the MAC-based deny (blacklist) filter entries for a site (paginated). Returns MAC addresses blocked from network access.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "getUrlFilterBlacklist"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (1-based).
siteIdNoSite ID to target. If omitted, uses the default site from OMADA_SITE_ID config. Use listSites to discover available site IDs.
pageSizeNoNumber of results per page (1–1000).
customHeadersNoOptional HTTP headers to include in the Omada API request (e.g. {"X-Custom-Header": "value"}). Rarely needed.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.18.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It adds useful context by stating the operation is paginated and returns MAC addresses blocked from network access, but it does not mention permissions, rate limits, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by the return content. There is no wasted language.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich input schema, no required parameters, and the absence of an output schema, the description is largely complete: it names the resource and summarizes the returned data. The main missing contextual piece is any explicit note about permissions or safety behavior, which is relevant because no annotations exist.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all four parameters, including defaults and ranges. The description adds only the loose concepts of site targeting and pagination, which are already fully covered by the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: getting MAC-based deny/blacklist filter entries for a site. It distinguishes this from an allow/whitelist tool through the 'deny (blacklist)' wording, though it does not explicitly name sibling alternatives such as getUrlFilterWhitelist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and does not mention alternatives such as the whitelist counterpart. The intended usage is only implied by the tool's purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools