Skip to main content
Glama

getOswAclList

Get the switch ACL list (paginated). Returns per-port or VLAN-based access control rules applied to managed switches.

Instructions

Get the switch ACL list (paginated). Returns per-port or VLAN-based access control rules applied to managed switches.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "getOswAclList"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoStart page number. Start from 1.
siteIdNoSite ID to target. If omitted, uses the default site from OMADA_SITE_ID config. Use listSites to discover available site IDs.
pageSizeNoNumber of entries per page. Range: 1-1000.
customHeadersNoOptional HTTP headers to include in the Omada API request (e.g. {"X-Custom-Header": "value"}). Rarely needed.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.18.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that results are paginated and returns per-port or VLAN-based rules, but does not describe permissions, rate limits, output shape, or whether any side effects occur beyond the obvious read-only implication of 'Get'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences with zero waste. The core purpose and return content are front-loaded immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema is rich and fully documented, which covers invocation parameters well. However, with no output schema and no annotations, the description could do more to clarify the returned structure or distinguish this tool from the many sibling ACL tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents page, siteId, pageSize, and customHeaders. The description mentions pagination broadly but adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema provides, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: getting the switch ACL list, with pagination and the kind of rules returned. It implicitly separates switch ACLs from gateway/EAP ACL siblings by naming 'switch', but does not explicitly name or contrast those alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'switch ACL list' implies when to use this tool rather than gateway or EAP ACL tools, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or named alternatives such as listOsgAcls or listEapAcls.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools