Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to safe-omada-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants monitor and manage TP-Link Omada controllers. It provides analytics and read-only queries plus write operations such as rebooting devices, blocking clients, and changing network or firewall settings.
      84
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to read and safely modify TP-Link Omada networks through capability-gated tools, with a default read-only profile and dry-run writes for security.
      11
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that turns Claude into a UniFi network specialist. Manage devices, optimize WiFi, audit security, and troubleshoot your network through natural language.
      31
      11 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 117 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tool set contains many overlapping and explicitly deprecated aliases that perform the same or nearly the same operation, such as getQosPolicy vs getQosPolicyRule/getQosMarkingRule/getDscpConfig, getApplicationAcl vs getAppControlRules, getDevice vs listDevices, and getClient vs listClients/getClientDetail. While some tools have distinct scopes, the volume of duplicate and near-duplicate endpoints makes misselection likely without reading full descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are camelCase and generally start with a verb such as get/list/search/diagnose, but the conventions are mixed: some use getXxx, some listXxx, and many use site-scoped prefixes like getSitesApsIpSetting or getSitesGatewaysGeneralConfig alongside device-scoped names like getApGeneralConfig. The pattern is readable but inconsistent enough that an agent cannot reliably predict whether a resource uses get, list, or a sites-prefixed form.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 117 tools, the surface is far too large for an agent to navigate efficiently, especially because many are deprecated aliases, near-duplicates, or narrow single-field configuration getters. The count reflects endpoint-by-endpoint exposure rather than a well-scoped tool set.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is almost entirely read-only get/list/diagnose operations and lacks obvious write/update/delete operations for configuration, which may be intentional for a 'safe' server but is a major capability gap. It also references missing actions such as triggerSpeedTest and triggerRfScan in descriptions, creating dead ends where the tool set cannot perform an instructed prerequisite.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data