safe-omada-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to safe-omada-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI assistants monitor and manage TP-Link Omada controllers. It provides analytics and read-only queries plus write operations such as rebooting devices, blocking clients, and changing network or firewall settings.84MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to read and safely modify TP-Link Omada networks through capability-gated tools, with a default read-only profile and dry-run writes for security.111MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes TP-Link Omada controller APIs to AI copilots and automation workflows, enabling listing sites, devices, clients, and invoking arbitrary Omada endpoints.84MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for TP-Link Omada SDN controllers, enabling querying controller, site, device, and WiFi state.8Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Ubiquiti UniFi Network: monitor and manage your network from Claude and other AI assistants. Runs in Docker.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that turns Claude into a UniFi network specialist. Manage devices, optimize WiFi, audit security, and troubleshoot your network through natural language.3111 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 117 tools
The tool set contains many overlapping and explicitly deprecated aliases that perform the same or nearly the same operation, such as getQosPolicy vs getQosPolicyRule/getQosMarkingRule/getDscpConfig, getApplicationAcl vs getAppControlRules, getDevice vs listDevices, and getClient vs listClients/getClientDetail. While some tools have distinct scopes, the volume of duplicate and near-duplicate endpoints makes misselection likely without reading full descriptions.
All names are camelCase and generally start with a verb such as get/list/search/diagnose, but the conventions are mixed: some use getXxx, some listXxx, and many use site-scoped prefixes like getSitesApsIpSetting or getSitesGatewaysGeneralConfig alongside device-scoped names like getApGeneralConfig. The pattern is readable but inconsistent enough that an agent cannot reliably predict whether a resource uses get, list, or a sites-prefixed form.
With 117 tools, the surface is far too large for an agent to navigate efficiently, especially because many are deprecated aliases, near-duplicates, or narrow single-field configuration getters. The count reflects endpoint-by-endpoint exposure rather than a well-scoped tool set.
The surface is almost entirely read-only get/list/diagnose operations and lacks obvious write/update/delete operations for configuration, which may be intentional for a 'safe' server but is a major capability gap. It also references missing actions such as triggerSpeedTest and triggerRfScan in descriptions, creating dead ends where the tool set cannot perform an instructed prerequisite.