Skip to main content
Glama

queryEntities

Read-onlyIdempotent

Query 3D globe entities by name, type, or geographic bounding box to retrieve matching data.

Instructions

Query page entities by name, type, or geographic extent. Returns { success: boolean, data?: unknown, message?: string, error?: string }.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bboxNoSpatial extent filter [west, south, east, north] (degrees)
nameNoName fuzzy match (case-insensitive)
typeNoFilter by entity type
sessionIdNoTarget browser session ID for multi-browser routing (optional)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
errorNo
messageNo
successYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. Description adds the return type shape and filter semantics, which goes beyond annotations without repetition.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, 13 words before the return shape. Front-loaded with the verb and resource, no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only query tool with all-optional parameters, the description and output schema are sufficient. Minor ambiguity whether no filters returns all entities, but this is a common accepted behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 4 parameters with descriptions and 100% coverage. Description paraphrases three of them but does not add new meaning beyond what schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'Query' plus resource 'page entities' and three filter dimensions (name, type, geographic extent). Instantly distinguishable from sibling mutation tools like addMarker and removeEntity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for retrieving entities by optional criteria. No explicit exclusions or comparisons to alternatives, but context from sibling names (add*, update*, remove*) makes it obvious this is the querying tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gaopengbin/cesium-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server