Skip to main content
Glama

addModel

Add a 3D model (glTF/GLB) at specified geographic coordinates, with options for placement height, orientation, and scale.

Instructions

Add a glTF or GLB model at geographic coordinates. Returns { success: boolean, data?: unknown, message?: string, error?: string }.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesglTF/GLB model file URL
rollNoRoll angle (degrees)
labelNoModel label text
pitchNoPitch angle (degrees)
scaleNoModel scale factor
heightNoPlacement height (meters)
headingNoHeading angle (degrees), 0=North
latitudeYesLatitude (-90 to 90)
longitudeYesLongitude (-180 to 180)
sessionIdNoTarget browser session ID for multi-browser routing (optional)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false (mutation) and destructiveHint=false. The description adds the return type structure but no additional behavioral traits such as side effects, auth needs, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is clear and front-loaded. Includes the return type. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 10 parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks explanation of parameter interactions or default behaviors. Schema descriptions are detailed, so overall completeness is acceptable but not excellent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description does not add any new meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (add), the resource (glTF/GLB model), and the placement context (geographic coordinates), making it easy to distinguish from siblings like addMarker or addGeoJsonLayer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., addMarker, addGeoJsonPrimitive). The description does not mention exclusions, prerequisites, or context for choosing this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gaopengbin/cesium-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server