create_folder
Create a new folder to organize your notes by project, topic, or category.
Instructions
Create a new folder for organizing notes.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Path for the new folder (e.g., 'projects/2024') |
Create a new folder to organize your notes by project, topic, or category.
Create a new folder for organizing notes.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Path for the new folder (e.g., 'projects/2024') |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral details such as whether the folder can overwrite existing structures, required permissions, or side effects. The description is too brief to inform the agent of potential impacts.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool, though could benefit from slight elaboration without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It fails to address behavior on duplicate paths, return value, or success/failure conditions, which are needed for a creation action.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides 100% coverage with a description for the 'path' parameter. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already states, so it meets the baseline but does not enhance understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (create) and the resource (folder), with a specific purpose (organizing notes). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_note or create_note_from_template, which operate on notes rather than folders.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_note or get_backlinks. The description lacks context for decision-making, like prerequisites or scenarios where folder creation is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gamosoft/NoteDiscovery'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server