Skip to main content
Glama
NoteDiscovery MCP Server

NoteDiscovery MCP Server

by gamosoft

Related Servers

Alternatives to NoteDiscovery MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A free, open-source Markdown editor with a bundled MCP server (stdio, read-only): point Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client at your notes vault for local semantic search, read, and list. ~15MB, 5 platforms, MIT, local-first.
      1,603
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first markdown vault with a built-in MCP server (streamable HTTP). 16 tools and 2 resources for Claude Code / Desktop / Cursor: read/write/search plus context_for_query, find_orphans, weekly_digest, compare_notes, semantic_outline. Per-folder agent permissions, LanceDB vectors, local Xenova ONNX embedder swappable to Ollama. Single Bun binary. AGPL.
      36
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to read, write, and organize notes in a local-first, human-in-the-loop note-taking app.
      3 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that gives AI coding agents shared live docs, memory and session context from plain Markdown files on disk, with search, note editing, hand-over tasks and linting. It also provides a web UI with a graph of how notes connect, password-protected tokens, and offline sync.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first CLI and MCP server that helps you build and search a personal knowledge vault from Markdown notes, with semantic search and AI-powered features like stale note detection and session memory harvesting. It’s provider-agnostic, requires no GPU in its default mode, and exposes your vault as long-term memory to any MCP-compatible AI tool like Claude Code.
      47
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (get_note vs list_notes vs search_notes vs get_recent_notes are clearly separable), and descriptions actively disambiguate the write paths. The main overlap is that create_note also updates existing notes, putting it in tension with edit_note and append_to_note, and the docs reference a non-existent update_note tool, which muddies selection slightly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly everything follows a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_note, list_tags, create_folder, move_note, delete_folder, search_notes). The only deviations are health_check (noun-based) and the inconsistent verb choices for note writing (create/edit/append), which are minor and still readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 22 tools this sits at the heavy end of the scale for a note vault server, spanning notes, folders, tags, graph, templates, and admin. Each tool is plausibly useful, but the surface could be trimmed (e.g. folding recent/config/health into generic listings) without losing capability.

    Completeness4/5

    Note lifecycle is well covered (read, create, edit, append, move, delete) along with folders, tags, graph/backlinks, search, and templates. Gaps remain: no tag add/remove or rename operations, no template create/update/delete, and no outgoing-link inspection beyond the full graph, plus a dangling reference to an update_note tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUsually handled