jusbrasil-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUSBRASIL_HEADLESS | No | Runs without a window (headless mode). | true |
| JUSBRASIL_TIMEOUT_MS | No | Timeout per navigation in milliseconds. | 60000 |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| buscar_jurisprudenciaA | Pesquisa jurisprudencia no JusBrasil, com filtros reais do site. |
| ler_decisaoA | Le uma decisao individual do JusBrasil e extrai todos os metadados. |
| buscar_sumulasA | Pesquisa sumulas no JusBrasil (usa o filtro real jurisType=sumula). |
| ler_inteiro_teorA | Extrai o TEXTO INTEGRAL de uma decisao (relatorio + voto + acordao completos). |
| compilar_dossieA | Compila varias decisoes/sumulas num UNICO documento Word (.docx). |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tools are mostly distinct, with buscar_jurisprudencia and buscar_sumulas sharing similar but clarified purposes. The two reading tools (ler_decisao and ler_inteiro_teor) could cause confusion, but the descriptions clearly differentiate metadata extraction from full text retrieval.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in Brazilian Portuguese (e.g., buscar_jurisprudencia, compilar_dossie), making it easy to infer each tool's purpose.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for legal research, covering searching, reading decisions, and compiling dossiers. The count is neither too few nor excessive.
The tool set covers the core workflow of searching, reading, and compiling jurisprudence. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of support for specific court filters and reliance on external login for full text, but the overall functionality is sufficient for its stated purpose.