frida_sqlite_open

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description mentions using Frida's SqliteDatabase API and sandbox view but lacks details on side effects (e.g., does it close the database? what if already open?), state changes, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is ultra-concise (3 lines), front-loads the main action, and every sentence adds value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; complexity moderate. Description covers basic purpose and parameters but lacks complete behavioral context (e.g., prerequisites, lifecycle, error handling). Adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description explains 'target' as process name or pid and 'db_path' as path to .db file. This adds meaning beyond the bare schema, though still minimal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool opens a SQLite database and lists tables, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like frida_sqlite_exec by focusing on listing tables.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies use for opening and listing tables but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like frida_sqlite_dump or frida_sqlite_exec. No exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.