Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
fuzzmind-frida-mcp

fuzzmind-frida-mcp

by fuzzmind
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

frida_sqlite_dump

Dump the full schema and data of a SQLite database from a target process by specifying process name and database path.

Instructions

Full schema + data dump of a SQLite database in the target process.

target: process name or pid (string). db_path: path to the .db file.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "target": "<target>",
      "db_path": "<db_path>"
    },
    "name": "frida_sqlite_dump"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
targetYes
db_pathYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states dump is a read operation but doesn't explicitly confirm it doesn't modify the database or disclose permissions needed. Lacks safety details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences plus parameter list, no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, yet description fails to mention return format, size, or structure of the dump. For a dump tool, output details are important for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, description adds basic meaning: 'target: process name or pid' and 'db_path: path to the .db file'. This matches parameters but no extra context like path format or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it performs 'Full schema + data dump of a SQLite database', which is specific and distinguishes from siblings like frida_sqlite_exec (execute SQL) and frida_sqlite_open (open only).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage from name and description, but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like frida_sqlite_exec or frida_sqlite_open, nor prerequisites (e.g., process must be attached).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools