frida_session_resume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Call Session.resume()' without disclosing effects, side effects, error conditions, or whether the session must exist or be in a specific state. The behavioral implications of resuming are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (3 words), which is concise but at the cost of informativeness. It is front-loaded but lacks important context. Every word is necessary, but more information would be beneficial.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations, no output schema, and 0% parameter coverage, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the tool's full behavior, return values (if any), or preconditions. For a lifecycle method like resume, more context is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the 'session_id' parameter. It does not explain what the default null means (e.g., current session?) or how to specify a different session. The parameter's semantic role is not clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Call Session.resume()' clearly states the verb (calls) and the resource (Session.resume method). It implies an action on a Frida session. However, it doesn't elaborate what 'resume' does in context (e.g., resume a paused session?), but it is specific enough to distinguish from other session tools like frida_session_is_detached or frida_session_clear_events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., session must be in a paused state) or exclusions. The sibling tools include many session-related tools, but the description offers no help in choosing this one.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.