adb_baseband_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the types of information retrieved (e.g., IMEI, SIM state) but does not mention any behavioral traits such as whether the operation is read-only, requires specific permissions, or has side effects. For a read tool, this is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the core purpose ('Get comprehensive modem/baseband identification') and then enumerates key data categories efficiently. Every word adds value, with no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks context about the output format and does not emphasize that IMEI retrieval is opt-in (handled by the includeImei parameter). Given the sensitivity of IMEI data, this omission could lead to misuse. However, the list of covered categories provides moderate completeness for a straightforward read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already documented. The description does not add meaning beyond what the schema provides; it only lists output categories. Therefore, it meets the baseline for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get comprehensive modem/baseband identification' and lists specific categories such as firmware version, RIL implementation, chipset, IMEI, SIM state, and radio capabilities. This distinguishes it from siblings like adb_device_info or adb_telephony, as it focuses specifically on baseband/modem details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention situations where adb_device_info or adb_telephony might be more appropriate. The agent must infer the scope from the listed output fields, but no explicit contextual advice is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.